2%Anxiety / GERD — inconsistent with vital deviation
Physician override logged · HIPAA audited
✓ AcceptOverride
🚨 Live Queue — 10:15am
sorted by AI urgency
1
Robert Vasquez
Chest tightness, arm pain, sweating
⚡ IMMEDIATE
2
Dana Kim
Severe headache, neck stiffness
⚠ URGENT
3
Marcus Lee
Shortness of breath, 2-day onset
⚠ URGENT
4
Patricia Chen
Medication follow-up
✓ Routine
5
Thomas Grant
Annual physical
✓ Routine
📂 Same Reading, Different Triage
History changes the conclusion
No prior records
148/92
First visit. No hypertension history.
✓ Routine — monitor
5 records ingested
148/92
Controlled at 112/74 three weeks ago. Today: headache + visual changes.
⚡ Immediate — acute spike
Ab
Abstrabit Technologies
AI Process Automation
Results
Business Impact
Right Patient Seen First. Every Time. With a Reasoning Trace They Can Examine.
Seconds
AI pre-assessment — replaced 15–20 min manual review
Chain of Thought
Visible reasoning — physician examines the argument
HIPAA
Every recommendation logged · every override captured
Assessment Time
Before
15–20 min
After (AI)
Seconds
Critical Patient ID
Before
During physician review
After
At intake
Physician Decision Support
Before
Start from scratch
After
CoT diagnosis + scores
Tech Stack
GPT-4o Clinical ReasoningMed-Prompt FrameworkChain of Thought (CoT)5-Record History IngestionUrgency ClassificationReact · Vite · TypeScriptPython Flask BackendAWS DynamoDB · EC2AWS Cognito (HIPAA)CloudWatch Audit Log
Metric
Before
After
Initial assessment
15–20 min manual
Seconds (AI)
Critical identification
During physician review
Flagged at intake
Prioritization
First-come, first-served
Urgency-based queue
Decision support
Start from scratch
CoT diagnosis + scores
History at intake
Not surfaced
5 records integrated
Audit trail
Manual documentation
Automated · every action
Why Visible Reasoning Is the Product
An AI that returns "82% unstable angina" without showing its work is a liability. The Chain of Thought trace lets physicians examine the argument — demographics, vitals deviation, symptom clusters, historical patterns — and decide whether they agree. That's the product: not a prediction, but a reasoned argument a physician can evaluate.